Naomi Freundlich and staff of The Commonwealth Fund, Primary Care: Our First Line of Defense, The Commonwealth Fund, June 2013.
Imagine if the only place you could bring your child when she develops a fever or an ear infection, or needs a checkup or a refill for her asthma inhaler, was to a hospital emergency room. Or imagine you have multiple medical problems—diabetes, high blood pressure, and high cholesterol, say—yet don’t have a regular doctor you can trust will make sure you’re getting all the right care you need to keep them under control.
In other words, imagine how difficult it would be to get all the care you and your family need to stay healthy without a primary care provider.
Whether a family physician, an internist, a pediatrician, or a nurse practitioner, primary care providers are often the first contact we have with the health care system. Practicing in private offices, community health centers, and hospitals, they diagnose and treat common illnesses and spot minor health problems before they become serious ones. They offer preventive services such as flu shots, cancer screening, and counseling on diet and smoking, and play an important role in helping to manage the care of patients with chronic health conditions.
When people don’t have access to a regular primary care provider, they end up in emergency rooms more often, and they’re admitted to hospitals more frequently. Without regular screening, a controllable condition like high cholesterol—which often can be kept in check with common drugs—can eventually lead to a life-threatening heart attack.
The evidence shows that good access to primary care can help us live longer, feel better, and avoid disability and long absences from work. In areas of the country where there are more primary care providers per person, death rates for cancer, heart disease, and stroke are lower and people are less likely to be hospitalized. Another big plus: health care costs are lower when people have a primary care provider overseeing their care and coordinating all the tests, procedures, and follow-up care.
Easier access to primary care is a key to both improving the quality of health care overall and reining in our country’s high medical costs. But making primary care more accessible is just the start. Primary care practices are increasingly becoming the hub of a new model of care known as the patientcentered medical home.
The basic mission of a medical home is to build a close partnership between clinicians and patients—to ensure that we aren’t left alone to navigate an increasingly complex health care system, and that we receive the care most appropriate to our individual needs. This means:
All these activities are geared toward a single goal: ensuring that the patient always remains front and center.
To make the medical home the building block of the health care system, physician practices will need to invest in technologies such as electronic health records (more on these below) and Web-based systems for scheduling and communicating with patients online. Clinicians and staff, meanwhile, will need to work together in teams to treat patients with multiple chronic conditions, who require an extra level of care. Changes are also needed in the way health insurers pay for care, so that providers are encouraged and rewarded for delivering a variety of patient services—from answering patients’ questions by email to coordinating with a patient’s other care providers—that lead to better long-term health and lower overall costs.
The Affordable Care Act—the health reform law popularly known as “Obamacare”—contains funding for expanded primary care and for existing medical home initiatives across the country that reach more than a million Medicare and Medicaid enrollees. Many private insurers are also experimenting with ways to reward health care providers for delivering comprehensive primary care.
For all, the goal is that medical homes will improve health outcomes and reduce the expense associated with a lack of coordination in patients’ care, frequent emergency room visits, avoidable hospitalizations, and the costly move to nursing home care.
To have the greatest impact, a medical home must be located at the center of a “medical neighborhood” inhabited by hospitals, specialty physicians, physical therapists, social workers, long-term care facilities, mental health professionals, and other service providers. It is the role of the primary care provider to coordinate care and make sure that patients don’t slip through the cracks—or receive tests or procedures they’ve already had. This is particularly a concern for patients who see multiple doctors.
Take, for example, the hypothetical case of Mr. W., an elderly man with diabetes who lives alone. Mr. W. has a primary care doctor but hasn’t seen her for close to a year—because of his faltering memory and a lack of reliable transportation. During that time, he should have been taking several medications to control his blood sugar, cholesterol, and blood pressure. He was also supposed to be monitoring his glucose on a daily basis.
But Mr. W. doesn’t always remember to take his pills—and, besides, the blood pressure drug makes his skin dry and itchy. He’s also not sure how to read the glucose meter and, already overweight, he struggles to maintain a healthy diet. The result: Mr. W. is now living with poorly controlled diabetes and progressive heart disease—a not uncommon outcome for someone in his situation. Eventually, he is rushed to the ER with a heart attack and hospitalized for a week afterward.
Typically it costs about $12,000 a year to cover an adult with diabetes whose condition is stable. But if the condition is uncontrolled, as is the case with Mr. W., a diabetic person can rack up expenses averaging $102,000 per year, with costs shouldered by a combination of the patient and his family, the insurance company, government programs like Medicare, and sometimes hospitals, if the patient is uninsured.
If, on the other hand, Mr. W. were enrolled in a patient-centered medical home, his story might be very different. First, a nurse care manager embedded in Mr. W.’s primary care practice stays in regular contact with him to find out if he is renewing his prescriptions, taking his medications, and monitoring his blood glucose level. Mr. W.’s electronic health record automatically alerts the practice when it’s time for a checkup or blood test.
When that happens, a nurse or social worker calls and helps arrange transportation to the doctor’s office. A nurse care manager is always available—24/7—to help Mr. W. with his health needs, and talks regularly with his primary care physician to coordinate the care and support they provide. !!!PAGE BREAK!!!
When Mr. W. has to see a cardiologist or other specialist, this too is set up by the medical home staff. Results of any tests are sent directly to his primary care provider and then integrated into his health record. With this kind of coordination, Mr. W.’s diabetes is much more likely to remain under control, because the system is designed to catch early signs of trouble. If, in fact, he does end up in the hospital, Mr. W’s primary care team would help with his transition home, set up nursing or home care, help schedule follow-up appointments, and ensure that he knows how to manage his chronic conditions.
The Patient-Centered Primary Care Collaborative provides realworld examples of how medical homes can improve care while saving money. For example, Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey has been able to cut emergency room use by 26 percent and hospital readmissions by 25 percent among its medical home enrollees. And HealthPartners in Minnesota reports 39 percent fewer ER visits, 40 percent fewer hospital readmissions, and a reduction in appointment wait times from 26 days to 1 day.
For patient-centered medical homes to live up to their potential, many insurers will need to rethink how they pay for care. Today it’s common for an internist or other primary care doctor to be paid a separate fee for each office visit, blood test, EKG, or other test or procedure. The problem with this kind of fee-for-service reimbursement system—which has prevailed for decades in the U.S.—is that it encourages doctors to order more tests than may be necessary and to perform more procedures, leading to unneeded treatments, or even harm to the patient. In doing so, it also drives costs skyward.
Doctors working within medical homes, however, are paid not for providing the most care, but for providing the most appropriate care. That includes spending extra time with patients to help them make informed decisions about their treatment, following up with them after they’ve left the hospital, and overseeing the care received from other providers. And it requires that insurers recognize the value of hiring community health workers or nurse case managers to make sure patients with chronic conditions like diabetes or heart disease take their medications, eat correctly and exercise, and join wellness programs.
The push to pay for quality, not quantity, is already happening in places around the country. In demonstration projects funded by the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services, health care providers in several states are receiving a single fee that covers all costs related to a particular patient or group of patients. Doctors share in the savings achieved when they provide excellent preventive care, communicate regularly with patients, and take other steps to keep patients out of the hospital and emergency room.
Some private insurers are also using the lure of incentives to motivate primary care practices to become medical homes. The BlueCross BlueShield Association reports that medical homes run by member companies now cover some 4 million patients in 39 states. They give participating physicians a 12 percent increase over the usual fees for services and throw in an extra $200 per patient if providers agree to manage the care of chronically ill enrollees over the long term. This involves working with patients to develop a personalized treatment plan and conducting regular follow-up through phone calls or office visits. It also means helping patients achieve positive lifestyle changes like quitting smoking or losing weight.
This year, nearly 60 percent of participating BlueCross BlueShield physicians earned incentive payments for lowering the total cost of care for their patient population.!!!PAGE BREAK!!!
In addition to adopting health information technology like electronic health records, medical homes that are part of an accountable care organization, or ACO, can expand their capacity to provide comprehensive care to patients. An ACO is made up of providers, including primary care practices, hospitals, and pharmacies, that agree to share responsibility for the quality and cost of care delivered to a specific population of patients. Their goal is twofold: 1) to provide seamless care, where patients’ needs are anticipated and met, and 2) to keep costs under control. Already there are Medicare ACOs, Medicaid ACOs, and private ACOs that manage the care of people living in a particular region.
Accountable care organizations are a new phenomenon, and it’s still far too early to draw any conclusions about their impact on the health care system. But if they can deliver on their promise to improve patient outcomes, patient experiences, and health care costs, they could have a transformative effect on American health care.
By now it should be clear that primary care is integral to an effective, efficient health care system. Still, there are concerns that there will not be enough practitioners—doctors and nurses—to meet the growing demand for services as the Affordable Care Act expands the number of Americans with insurance coverage. An estimated 65 million Americans now live in areas with a shortage of primary care providers, yet only one-third of U.S. physicians are practicing as primary care doctors. While the share of fourth-year medical students opting for a career in primary care has increased in the past two years, it’s not enough to solve the problem.
The Affordable Care Act contains several initiatives to increase the primary care provider pool. Already some $250 million has been earmarked for training a total of 1,700 physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants to work in primary care settings. The health law also provides $1.5 billion over five years to expand the National Health Service Corps, which repays educational loans and offers scholarships to primary care providers who choose to practice in “medically underserved” areas—those with a shortage of primary care physician practices. According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, today nearly 10,000 National Health Service Corps providers are delivering primary care to 10.4 million people.
Though that increase is substantial, it will likely not be enough to meet the soaring demand for primary care. The answer, many experts believe, lies in changing the way patient care is delivered. By making greater use of electronic medical records and other information technologies, by relying more on nurse practitioners and other nonphysicians to provide services, and by having clinicians work together in teams, we can fill the primary care gap. And in doing so, we’ll create a more a solid foundation for our nation’s health care system.