Brian Smedley
B. D. Smedley, "Moving Beyond Access: Achieving Equity in State Health Care Reform," Health Affairs, March/April 2008 27(2):447–55.
In the absence of federal action, states around the nation are moving forward with health care reforms intended to control rising costs, expand health insurance coverage, and improve the quality of care. As they seek to improve their health systems, states should also take advantage of opportunities to reduce racial and ethnic health disparities, says Brian D. Smedley, Ph.D., in a new Health Affairs article supported by The Commonwealth Fund.
In "Moving Beyond Access: Achieving Equity in State Health Care Reform" (Health Affairs, Mar./Apr. 2008), Smedley argues that insurance coverage expansions, while crucial, are not sufficient to improve the health and health care of minority and low-income Americans. Instead, states must make comprehensive reforms to address the root causes of health care disparities.
Smedley, the research director for The Opportunity Agenda, served as study director for the Institute of Medicine's 2003 report, Unequal Treatment: Confronting Ethnic and Racial Disparities in Health Care, which outlined the human and economic costs of health disparities.
Since minority populations make up about half of the nation's 47 million uninsured, expanding health coverage should go a long way toward addressing disparities. Yet insurance coverage is not enough; states also must remove financial, cultural, and structural barriers to care.
States can adopt policies to ensure that health premiums and other out-of-pocket costs do not deter patients from getting needed care. They can also promote culturally and linguistically appropriate health care services—for example, by creating incentives for providers to adopt the federal standards developed by the Office of Minority Health.
Other policies that could improve access to care for minority and low-income populations include:
Addressing problems with the quality of health care is another way to reduce health disparities. To improve the quality of care provided through public programs, states can create performance incentives and measure and report on quality. States also can encourage health plans and providers to collect data on patients' race, ethnicity, income, education level, and primary language to help identify disparities and target quality improvement efforts.
Smedley notes that performance measurement should take into account the challenges of serving minority and low-income patients, who are typically sicker than other populations. For example, providers who reduce disparities and improve health outcomes relative to baseline measures could receive rewards.
Giving patients the tools to navigate the health system and manage their conditions could help to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of care. The Illinois Covered Act, for example, would create new patient education and empowerment programs focused on chronic disease management.
States can support community health workers—trained members of the community who teach disease prevention, assess health problems, and help neighbors obtain needed services. States also can encourage community health planning. The "Cover All Pennsylvanians" legislation would require charitable hospitals to work with local groups and government officials to produce a community needs assessment.
Poor and minority communities often lack sufficient health care resources, including private practices, hospitals, and clinics. To strengthen health care infrastructure, state and local subsidies can support safety-net hospitals, which are financially vulnerable due to low Medicaid reimbursement rates and the costs of providing uncompensated care. In addition, states can create incentives for providers to practice in underserved communities by funding graduate medical education or offering loan forgiveness. For example, to increase the number of dentists practicing in poor communities, Illinois has proposed to expand its loan forgiveness program to include these providers.
Comprehensive efforts to reduce racial and ethnic health disparities should address factors outside the health care arena, such as education, housing, and employment. States can address environmental threats in a community, such as poor air quality, or launch public health campaigns focused on obesity or smoking cessation.
"Eliminating health care inequality requires more than simply expanding coverage among currently un- and underinsured populations," Smedley concludes. "In particular, policymakers must attend to structural and community-level problems, such as the maldistribution of health care resources, the lack of effective mechanisms for underserved communities to participate in health care planning, and the presence of cultural and linguistic barriers in health care settings, to equalize access to high-quality care."
Facts and Figures
Also see the author's report, Identifying and Evaluating Equity Provisions in State Health Care Reform, published by The Commonwealth Fund.
An email has been sent to {{email}} with your reset password.
Account was not found. Please go to the login page and enter a new password.
Account was not found. Please try again with a different email address.
There was an error when attempting to send to {{email}}. Please contact an administrator.