Megan McHugh, Ph.D., Kevin Van Dyke, M.P.P., Awo Osei-Anto, M.P.P., and Ahmed Haque
M. McHugh, K. Van Dyke, A. Osei-Anto et al., "Medicare’s Payment Policy for Hospital-Acquired Conditions: Perspectives of Administrators from Safety-Net Hospitals," Medical Care Research and Review, published online May 19, 2011.
Authors in this study interviewed quality and financial officers at safety-net hospitals about the impact of a Medicare policy limiting reimbursement for treating avoidable and costly hospital-acquired conditions (HACs). Although hospital executives reported that the policy provided additional motivation to reduce HACs, few hospitals implemented new care practices and instead focused on documenting conditions that are present for patients on admission.
In 2008, Medicare implemented a policy to limit payment to hospitals for treating avoidable HACs, including pressure ulcers, falls and trauma, and foreign objects retained after surgery. Although the policy will expand nationally to Medicaid programs in 2011, little is known about the impact on safety-net hospitals, which may be disproportionately affected by the policy because they serve vulnerable populations with complex health conditions and because some may lack the resources to implement strategies to reduce HACs. To explore the impact of the policy, authors of this Commonwealth Fund–supported study interviewed chief quality officers and chief financial officers from safety-net hospitals.
The authors' findings indicate that safety-net hospitals may benefit from further guidance from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services in several areas. First, hospitals need clarification around appropriate use of testing for urinary tract infections (UTIs), a condition which is commonly present on admission, combined with information on preventing catheter-associated UTIs. Second, some respondents argued that some conditions on the HACs list—like falls and pressure ulcers—are not always preventable. Hospitals need prevention strategies for dealing with such conditions. Finally, several respondents in this study indicated initial estimates of large financial losses based on faulty assumptions, demonstrating the need for better educational materials regarding the scope of the policy.
From April to October 2009, the authors interviewed 115 chief quality and financial officers from 88 safety-net hospitals about their awareness of the policy, challenges and benefits, impact on care and finances, and speculation about future changes.
In addition to financial incentives, safety-net hospitals need more guidance from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to implement the policy and reduce their incidence of hospital-acquired conditions.