Skip to main content

Advanced Search

Advanced Search

Current Filters

Filter your query

Publication Types

Other

to

Blog

/

Lawmakers Eye Lame-Duck Session for Unfinished Health Care Business

House members walk down steps of U.S. Capitol building

Members of the U.S. House of Representatives leave the U.S. Capitol after a series of votes on September 25, 2024, in Washington, D.C. Health care priorities for the lame-duck Congress include extending temporary telehealth flexibilities, reauthorizing funding for safety-net programs, and voting on legislation to lower health care and drug costs. Photo: Anna Moneymaker via Getty Images

Members of the U.S. House of Representatives leave the U.S. Capitol after a series of votes on September 25, 2024, in Washington, D.C. Health care priorities for the lame-duck Congress include extending temporary telehealth flexibilities, reauthorizing funding for safety-net programs, and voting on legislation to lower health care and drug costs. Photo: Anna Moneymaker via Getty Images

Authors
  • Alyssa Llamas
    Alyssa Llamas

    Vice President, Impact Health Policy Partners

  • Lauren Testa headshot
    Lauren Testa

    Senior Vice President, Impact Health Policy Partners

Authors
  • Alyssa Llamas
    Alyssa Llamas

    Vice President, Impact Health Policy Partners

  • Lauren Testa headshot
    Lauren Testa

    Senior Vice President, Impact Health Policy Partners

Toplines
  • Health care priorities for the lame-duck Congress include extending temporary telehealth flexibilities, reauthorizing funding for safety net programs, and voting on legislation to lower health care and drug costs

  • The outcome of the November election will shape what action the lame-duck Congress will take on health care issues

Congress has until the end of the year to extend several expiring health care provisions, including COVID-19 telehealth flexibilities and funding for community health centers. But the parties will have to agree to policies that could help pay for these “must-do” items, perhaps by advancing bipartisan health policy priorities to help offset the extensions. The potential lame-duck health package could move with government funding due December 20. In this blog post, we highlight health policies that are primed for consideration this year.

“Must-Do” Items

Medicare

Several Medicare programs, waiver flexibilities, and temporary reimbursement increases expire December 31. Among these are a boost to Medicare physician payments that helped offset a more than 3 percent cut for 2024 and upward payment adjustments for low-volume and Medicare-dependent hospitals. Temporary telehealth flexibilities and the Acute Hospital Care at Home waiver, which were put in place during the COVID-19 public health emergency and have been extended multiple times, also expire at the end of the year. Congress is expected to again at least partially offset the anticipated 2.8 percent payment cut for Medicare providers in 2025, as it has for the last four years, and maintain the policies noted above for at least two years.

Health Care Safety Net

Congress is also expected to reauthorize funding for health care safety-net programs, such as community health centers, which expire at the end of the year. Similarly, Congress is likely to postpone Medicaid payment reductions to safety-net hospitals set to take effect in January.

Other Policy Priorities

Health Care and Drug Costs

Despite differing views on the role of the federal government in health care, Republicans and Democrats agree on a narrow set of provisions to lower health care and drug costs. The House-passed Lower Costs, More Transparency (LCMT) Act (H.R. 5378) is a likely starting point for negotiations. The bipartisan bill includes measures to strengthen price transparency requirements for hospitals, insurers, and pharmacy benefit managers; increase access to lower-cost generic medications; and require the same Medicare payment for physician-administered drugs regardless of whether the service is performed in an off-campus hospital outpatient department (HOPD) or a doctor’s office. Additionally, it includes a requirement for each off-campus HOPD to file Medicare hospital claims with a unique national provider identifier (NPI) rather than the NPI for the main hospital campus. This would disclose the specific location of care, which could facilitate future reforms to lower payments for medical procedures delivered in lower-cost settings to reduce overall health care spending. The Senate has not passed a comparable health package but has several similar bills that closely mirror proposals in the LCMT Act.

The enhanced premium tax credits (PTCs) expire at the end of 2025; Democrats are pushing for a one-year extension. They will advocate for making the policy permanent before expiration, but a short-term fix is necessary to provide health insurers with certainty and avoid severe premium increases for plan year 2026. Health insurers need to know by spring 2025 whether to account for the presence or absence of enhanced PTCs in setting premium rates for 2026. Such unpredictability makes it difficult for health insurers to anticipate the level of risk, and health care costs, of enrollees. Republicans strongly oppose a permanent extension, citing budgetary concerns.

Public Health

Partisan disagreements have stymied the reauthorization of key programs on substance use disorder prevention and treatment and pandemic preparedness. The SUPPORT Act and the Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act (PAHPA) expired on September 30, 2023. Several of these programs continue to get funded through annual appropriations, but they have not been updated to reflect lessons learned over the past five years.

Llamas_lame_duck_health_care_table_v2

Looking Ahead

The size and scope of a possible lame-duck health package largely depend on the outcome of the November election. If Republicans take control of Congress and the White House, it is unclear whether they will negotiate with Democrats. Some Republicans close to leadership prefer a lame-duck health package to “clear the decks” and allow for possible development and consideration of a budget reconciliation bill during the next Congress. A small group of Freedom Caucus members prefer to wait until early next year to legislate. However, if the election results in a divided government, both parties may be more willing to make a deal. The retirement of several health champions, including Rep. Michael C. Burgess (R–Texas) and Rep. Anna G. Eshoo (D–Calif.), may also mobilize dealmaking.

Any legislative action at the end of the year will inform policymaking in the new Congress, which already faces a hefty to-do list, including the reinstatement of the debt limit on January 2, 2025, and the expiration of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act on December 31, 2025.

Publication Details

Date

Contact

Alyssa Llamas, Vice President, Impact Health Policy Partners

[email protected]

Citation

Alyssa Llamas and Lauren Testa, “Lawmakers Eye Lame-Duck Session for Unfinished Health Care Business,” To the Point (blog), Commonwealth Fund, Oct. 29, 2024. https://doi.org/10.26099/JKXN-RP23