Affordable, quality health care. For everyone.

Maternal Mortality and Maternity Care in the United States Compared to 10 Other Developed Countries

Abstract

  • Issue: Most maternal deaths are preventable, but they have been increasing in the United States. Other high-income countries with success in preventing maternal deaths offer potential lessons for the U.S.
  • Goals: To compare maternal mortality rates in the U.S. with 10 other high-income countries and identify differences in maternal care workforces, postpartum care access, and paid maternity leave policies that may help account for observed differences.
  • Methods: Analysis of the latest data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, and grey literature.
  • Key Findings: The U.S. has the highest maternal mortality rate among developed countries. Obstetrician-gynecologists (ob-gyns) are overrepresented in its maternity care workforce relative to midwives, and there is an overall shortage of maternity care providers (both ob-gyns and midwives) relative to births. In most other countries, midwives outnumber ob-gyns by severalfold, and primary care plays a central role in the health system. Although a large share of its maternal deaths occur postbirth, the U.S. is the only country not to guarantee access to provider home visits or paid parental leave in the postpartum period.
  • Conclusion: The U.S. has a relative undersupply of maternity care providers, especially midwives, and lacks comprehensive postpartum supports.

Background

Although most are preventable, maternal deaths have been increasing in the United States since 2000.1 As U.S. policymakers and health care delivery system leaders seek ways to reverse this trend, countries that have achieved lower maternal mortality rates may offer possible solutions.

This issue brief provides an overview of differences in maternal mortality, maternal care workforce composition, and access to postpartum care and social protections in the U.S. compared to 10 other high-income countries: Australia, Canada, France, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom.2 We use the most recently available data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), and earlier Commonwealth Fund studies.3

Maternal Mortality and Timing of Deaths

Women in the U.S. are the most likely to die from complications related to pregnancy or childbirth.

In 2018, there were 17 maternal deaths for every 100,000 live births in the U.S. — a ratio more than double that of most other high-income countries (Exhibit 1). In contrast, the maternal mortality ratio was three per 100,000 or fewer in in the Netherlands, Norway, and New Zealand.

What We Mean by MaternAL Mortality4

There are three commonly used measures of maternal deaths in the United States. While they all capture some aspect of maternal deaths, they are not equivalent.

Pregnancy-associated death: Death while pregnant or within one year of the end of the pregnancy, irrespective of cause.

Pregnancy-related death: Death during pregnancy or within one year of the end of pregnancy from a pregnancy complication, a chain of events initiated by pregnancy, or the aggravation of an unrelated condition by the physiologic effects of pregnancy. Used in the U.S. only, this CDC measure is typically reported as a ratio per 100,000 births.

Maternal mortality: Death while pregnant or within 42 days of the end of pregnancy, irrespective of the duration and site of the pregnancy, from any cause related to or aggravated by the pregnancy or its management, but not from accidental or incidental causes. Used by the World Health Organization (WHO) in international comparisons, this measure is reported as a ratio per 100,000 births.

 

A relatively large share of pregnancy-related deaths in the U.S. occur after birth.

To better understand the high maternal death rate in the U.S., it is helpful to know when they happen.

  • Around one-third of U.S. pregnancy-related deaths, counted up to one year postbirth, occur during pregnancy (Exhibit 2).
  • 17 percent of deaths occur on the day of delivery.
  • 52 percent occur after delivery, or postpartum:
    • 19 percent of all maternal deaths occur between one and six days postpartum.
    • 21 percent of all maternal deaths are between one and six weeks postpartum.
    • 12 percent of all maternal deaths take place during the remaining portion of the year; these are also known as late maternal deaths.5

In the first week postpartum, severe bleeding, high blood pressure, and infection are the most common contributors to maternal deaths, while cardiomyopathy is the leading cause of late deaths.6 Previous research indicates that U.S. women experience more late maternal deaths than women in other high-income countries.7

Differences in Care During Pregnancy, Labor, and Delivery

The U.S. has an overall shortage of maternity care providers relative to the number of births.

Midwives in many countries are key care providers trained to provide a wide range of services. Among these are helping to manage a normal pregnancy, assisting with childbirth, and providing care during the postpartum period. Placing a priority on natural reproduction processes and relationship-building, midwives also can help address the social and personal needs of mother, baby, and family.8 Ob-gyns, meanwhile, are physicians trained to identify and intervene in abnormal conditions that come up before, during, and after pregnancy. They typically provide care in hospital-based settings.

Midwifery-led care models have been shown to provide care that is comparable to, or sometimes even better than, that provided by obstetrician-gynecologists, or ob-gyns (see box).9

The U.S. and Canada have the lowest overall supply of midwives and ob-gyns — 12 and 15 providers per 1,000 live births, respectively (Exhibit 3). All other countries have a supply that is between two and six times greater.

 

What Does the Evidence Say About the Relationship Between Midwifery Care and Birth Outcomes?

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends midwives as an evidence-based approach to reducing maternal mortality.10 Several systematic reviews have found that midwifery-led care for women with healthy pregnancies is comparable or preferable to physician-led care in terms of11:

  • Maternal (mother) and neonatal (baby) outcomes, including lower maternal mortality and morbidity and reduced stillbirths and preterm births.
  • More efficient use of health system resources, including lower use of unnecessary and potentially harmful interventions like C-sections for low-risk deliveries, epidurals, and instrument-assisted births.
  • Improved patient satisfaction and maternal psychosocial well-being outcomes, including those for postpartum depression.

Some experts note that “high-income countries with the lowest intervention rates, best outcomes, and lowest costs have integrated midwifery-led care” into their health care systems.

Cross-Country Differences in the Type and Supply of Maternity Care Providers

In the U.S. and Canada, ob-gyns outnumber midwives. The American College of Nurse Midwives claims that the “U.S. maternity workforce is upside down relative to patient needs,”12 noting that the majority of births are low-risk and could be managed by midwives, family practitioners, or general practitioners.13 In several countries, including Canada, France, and New Zealand, primary care physicians also play a large role (although comparative international data are lacking).

In most other countries, however, midwives greatly outnumber ob-gyns. For example, midwives provide most prenatal care and deliveries in the U.K. and the Netherlands14 — countries considered to have among the strongest primary care systems in Europe.15 Dutch midwives also deliver home births, which represent 13 percent of all births, the highest rate of any developed countries.16

In some countries, women can choose their maternity care provider, as both midwife and obstetrician care services are covered by universal health insurance. In England, care may be shared between midwives and obstetricians.17

In the U.S., midwife services are not uniformly covered by private insurance plans. This is particularly the case when services are provided in nonhospital settings, like the home or a birthing center.18 And while the Affordable Care Act (ACA) requires that state Medicaid programs cover midwifery care, the supply of providers is often so low that beneficiaries are often unable to access these services. Several factors, which can vary widely from state to state, may be limiting the supply of midwives in the U.S. Among these are the state licensure laws, restrictive scope-of-practice laws, and rules requiring physician supervision of midwives.19

Maternal Care After Delivery

Access to home visits after delivery varies in the U.S. but is guaranteed in other countries.

Postpartum care is intended to ensure the physical and emotional recovery of mothers and their babies.20 Home visits by a midwife or a nurse are associated with improved mental health and breastfeeding outcomes as well as reduced health care costs.21 All countries, apart from the U.S., guarantee at least one such visit within one week postpartum, although some U.S. states provide these for Medicaid beneficiaries (Exhibit 4).22 Home visits give providers an opportunity to address mental health concerns and allow them to assess social determinants of health, including needs for food, housing, financial security, and protection from domestic violence.23

The U.S. is the only high-income country that does not guarantee paid leave to mothers after childbirth.

Maternity leave helps women manage the physiological and psychological demands of motherhood and helps ensure financial security for families.24 All countries included in this study, apart from the U.S., mandate at least 14 weeks of paid leave from work. And several countries provide more than a year of maternity leave (Exhibit 5).

Policy Implications

While the reasons behind the high U.S. maternal mortality rate are multifaceted, our findings suggest that an undersupply of maternity providers, especially midwives, and lack of access to comprehensive postpartum supports are contributing factors.

Midwifery care. In most countries, maternity care is well integrated with other primary care, and midwives play an important role. Some U.S. states have strengthened access to midwives and achieved positive outcomes.25 During the COVID-19 pandemic, as demand for midwifery care has grown in the U.S. (as it has around the world), several states issued emergency orders expanding midwifery services to pregnant women, including Maine, New Jersey, and New York.26

While the ACA requires Medicaid to pay for midwifery care provided in freestanding birth centers, more needs to be done to expand access to services and make them more affordable. Among the key issues to address are state variations in scope-of-practice rules for health care practitioners, low reimbursement rates for midwives, and payment parity.27

Countries also have rapidly reorganized their maternity care delivery systems during COVID-19 to expand use of telemedicine and the capacity to provide home births.28 To strengthen maternity care during the pandemic, the U.S. could look to countries with long-standing experience in home births and midwifery-led care.

Insurance coverage. Universal, comprehensive maternity care coverage, along with exemptions from cost-sharing, also are the norm in other high-income countries.29 While the ACA strengthened maternity care coverage, access to benefits often depends on type of insurance and geographic location, and out-of-pocket costs vary significantly as well.30

 

How the Affordable Care Act Has Helped Women Gain Access to Maternity Care

  • Guaranteed issue: Insurers are no longer allowed to deny coverage to individuals who apply for insurance, including those with preexisting conditions.* Preexisting conditions specific to women include pregnancy, having had a C-section, and having been a victim of rape or domestic violence.
  • Community rate-setting for premiums: Insurers are no longer allowed to charge women higher health care premiums than they charge men. This was a previously common practice, as women were anticipated to have higher health care costs, especially around child-bearing years. Because of the ACA, insurers are only allowed to charge higher premiums based on age and tobacco use.*
  • Free preventive services: Insurers must provide preventive services such as breast cancer screening, cervical cancer screening, FDA-approved contraceptives, and osteoporosis and chlamydia screening for women in at-risk age groups, without copayments, coinsurance, or other cost-sharing.*
  • Essential health benefits: All individual marketplace or small-group insurance plans must cover 10 essential health benefits,* including maternity coverage.
  • Support for new mothers: Employers with at least 50 workers must allow nursing women reasonable breaks from work to express breast milk and must provide a private place to do so for the first year after a child’s birth.
  • Expanded Medicaid eligibility: Individuals with incomes up to 138 percent of the federal poverty level can enroll in Medicaid, though this has been left up to states’ discretion.* Thirty-eight states and the District of Columbia have opted to expand their Medicaid program.
  • Premium subsidies for low-income women: Premiums subsidies are available for all individuals earning up to 400 percent of the federal poverty level ($51,040 for an individual and $104,800 for a family of four in 2020) for the purchase of individual marketplace coverage.*
  • Coverage for young women: Young adults can stay on a parent’s plan until their 26th birthday.* Before the ACA, young women 19 to 25 were uninsured at some of the highest rates.31
  • Use of nurse midwives and freestanding birth centers: State Medicaid programs must include both as covered benefits. In addition, reimbursement for midwives was increased to the amount physicians receive for providing the same service.
  • Creation of Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program: Some 154,000 parents and children in 1,005 U.S. counties receive home visits through the program.32

* Also applies to men.

 

Postpartum care. Since more than half of maternal deaths occur after birth, strengthening postpartum care should be a priority. The World Health Organization recommends at least four health contacts in the first six weeks, yet U.S. women typically have a single office-based physician visit within this period, and some don’t have one at all.33

Expanding eligibility for Medicaid, which pays for 43 percent of U.S. deliveries, can lead to more stable postpartum coverage.34 Currently, however, the program’s coverage extends to only six weeks postpartum. Some states are expanding coverage up to one year, in line with recommendations by maternal mortality review committees and others.35

Paid leave. The U.S. is the only high-income country that does not guarantee all mothers paid maternity leave,36 although a few states have recently introduced some paid leave.37 Women receiving paid leave use fewer health care services compared to women with only unpaid leave.38

Racial disparities. The high maternal mortality rate in the U.S. masks dramatic variation by race and ethnicity: the number of deaths per 100,000 births for black non-Hispanic women in 2018 (37.1) was more than two times higher than that for white mothers (14.7). Hispanic women have the lowest rate (11.8).39 The pandemic has the potential to exacerbate existing U.S. racial disparities in maternal outcomes, as Black and Latino people have faced higher rates of economic hardship and mental health problems during the pandemic compared to their white counterparts.40

These disparities are not unique to the U.S., however. In the U.K., which has universal health coverage, maternal deaths were five times more common among Black women in the prepandemic period and two times more common among Asian women.41 Achieving equity in maternal outcomes remains a global challenge.

The well-being of mothers and babies should be a top policy priority in all countries. In the U.S., where maternal health outcomes are poor relative to many other parts of the world, policymakers and delivery system leaders can examine international models of maternity care to inform strategies for improvement.

 

How We Conducted This Study

This analysis used data from the 2020 release of health statistics compiled by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), which tracks and reports on a wide range of health system measures across 37 high-income countries. Data on maternal mortality ratios, supply of midwives, and supply of ob-gyns were extracted in August 2020. While the information collected by the OECD reflect the gold standard in international comparisons, it may mask differences in how countries collect their health data. Full details on how indicators were defined, as well as country-level differences in definitions, are available from the OECD.

We used the latest data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Pregnancy Mortality Surveillance System on the timing of maternal deaths in the U.S. While international data are available regarding timing of maternal and pregnancy-related deaths, findings for the U.S. did not correspond with the latest data from the CDC. Because of potential data comparability concerns, we omitted these findings from our formal analysis.

Data on postpartum home visits were compiled from a variety of country-specific sources, as specified in the notes to Exhibit 4, including a series of patient vignettes of a healthy 23-year-old woman who is pregnant for the first time, funded by the Commonwealth Fund and published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2015.42

Data on paid maternity leave are from the OECD’s Family Database.

The 10 comparator countries included in this brief represent those high-income countries that take part in the Commonwealth Fund’s annual International Health Policy Survey: Australia, Canada, France, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom.

 

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Dr. Jodie D. Katon, Dr. Eugene Declercq, and Reggie Williams II for their helpful review comments; and Jesse Baumgartner and Gabriella N. Aboulafia for their careful data review.

Notes

1. Lauren M. Rossen et al., “The Impact of the Pregnancy Checkbox and Misclassification on Maternal Mortality Trends in the United States, 1999–2017,” Vital and Health Statistics, series 3, no. 44 (National Center for Health Statistics, Jan. 2020); Marian F. MacDorman et al., “Recent Increases in the U.S. Maternal Mortality Rate: Disentangling Trends from Measurement Issues,” Obstetrics and Gynecology 128, no. 3 (Sept. 2016): 447–55; Building U.S. Capacity to Review and Prevent Maternal Deaths: Report from Nine Maternal Mortality Review Committees (Maternal Mortality Review Information Application and Review to Action, 2018); and Emily E. Petersen et al., “Vital Signs: Pregnancy-Related Deaths, United States, 2011–2015, and Strategies for Prevention, 13 States, 2013–2017,” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 68, no. 18 (May 10, 2019): 423–29.

2. Commonwealth Fund International Health Policy Survey.

3. Roosa Tikkanen et al. (eds.), International Profiles of Health Care Systems 2020 (Commonwealth Fund, June 2020); and Stephen Morrissey et al., “International Health Care Systems,” New England Journal of Medicine 372, no. 1 (Jan. 1, 2015): 75–76.

4. Eugene Declercq and Laurie Zephyrin, Maternal Mortality in the United States: A Primer (Commonwealth Fund, forthcoming).

5. Declercq and Zephyrin, Maternal Mortality: Primer, forthcoming.

6. Declercq and Zephyrin, Maternal Mortality: Primer, forthcoming.

7. Global Burden of Disease 2015 Maternal Mortality Collaborators, “Global, Regional, and National Levels of Maternal Mortality, 1990–2015: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015,” Lancet 388, no. 10053 (Oct. 8, 2016): 1775–812.

8. American College of Nurse-Midwives, Essential Facts About Midwives (ACNM, May 2019); World Health Organization, Nursing and Midwifery in the History of the World Health Organization 1948–2017 (WHO, 2017); Mary J. Renfrew et al., “Midwifery and Quality Care: Findings from a New Evidence-Informed Framework for Maternal and Newborn Care,” Lancet 384, no. 9948 (Sept. 20, 2014): 1129–45; and Jennifer E. Moore et al., Improving Maternal Health Access, Coverage, and Outcomes in Medicaid: A Resource for State Medicaid Agencies and Medicaid Managed Care Organizations (Institute for Medicaid Innovation, 2020).

9. Jane Sandall et al., “Midwife-Led Continuity Models Versus Other Models of Care for Childbearing Women,” Cochrane Database System Review 4 (Apr. 28, 2016): CD004667.

10. United Nations Population Fund, The State of World’s Midwifery 2014: A Universal Pathway. A Woman’s Right to Health. (UNFPA, 2014).

11. Renfrew et al., “Midwifery and Quality Care,” 2014.

12. Jesse S. Bushman, “The Role of Certified Nurse-Midwives and Certified Midwives in Ensuring Women’s Access to Skilled Maternity Care,” presentation, American College of Nurse-Midwives, Nov. 2015.

13. The American College of Nurse-Midwives estimates that approximately 60 percent of pregnancies are normal or low-risk. See Bushman, “Role of Certified Nurse-Midwives,” 2015. Other experts estimate that an even larger proportion of births, up to 90 percent, are considered uncomplicated. See UCSF Health, “High Risk Pregnancy,” n.d.

14. Martin Marshall, “A Precious Jewel — The Role of General Practice in the English NHS,” New England Journal of Medicine 372, no. 10 (Mar. 5, 2015): 893–97; and Ewout van Ginneken, “Perennial Health Care Reform — The Long Dutch Quest for Cost Control and Quality Improvement,” New England Journal of Medicine 373, no. 10 (Sept. 3, 2015): 885–89.

15. Dionne S. Kringos et al. (eds.), Building Primary Care in a Changing Europe (European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, 2015).

16. Lianne Zondag, Franka Cadee, and Myrte de Geus, Midwifery in the Netherlands, 2017 (Royal Dutch Organization of Midwives, Jan. 2017); and Dorothy Shaw et al., “Drivers of Maternity Care in High-Income Countries: Can Health Systems Support Woman-Centred Care?,” Lancet 388, no.10057 (Nov. 5, 2016): 2282–95.

17. Marshall, “A Precious Jewel,” 2015.

18. American College of Nurse-Midwives, Ensuring Access to High Value Providers: ACNM Survey of Marketplace Insurers Regarding Coverage of Midwifery Services (ANCM, Sept. 2014); Marian F. MacDorman and Eugene Declercq, “Trends and Characteristics of United States Out-of-Hospital Births 2004–2014: New Information on Risk Status and Access to Care,” Birth 43, no. 2 (June 2016): 116–24.

19. Y. Tony Yang and Katy B. Kozhimannil, “Making a Case to Reduce Legal Impediments to Midwifery Practice in the United States,” Women’s Health Issues 25, no. 4 (July–Aug. 2015): 314–17.

20. World Health Organization et al., Postnatal Care for Mothers and Newborns: Highlights from the World Health Organization 2013 Guidelines (WHO et al., April 2015).

21. Christine MacArthur et al., “Effects of Redesigned Community Postnatal Care on Women’s Health 4 Months After Birth: A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial,” Lancet 359, no. 9304 (2002): 378–85; Ian M. Paul et al., “A Randomized Trial of Single Home Nursing Visits vs. Office-Based Care After Nursery/Maternity Discharge: The Nurses for Infants Through Teaching and Assessment After the Nursery (NITTANY) Study,” Archives of Pediatric Adolescent Medicine 166, no. 3 (Mar. 2012): 263–70; and Kenneth A. Dodge et al., “Implementation and Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluation of Universal Postnatal Nurse Home Visiting,” American Journal of Public Health 104, no. S1 (Feb. 2014): S136–S143.

22. Kathy Gifford et al., Medicaid Coverage of Pregnancy and Perinatal Benefits: Results from a State Survey (Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, Apr. 2017).; and Alison Stuebe et al., “Extending Medicaid Coverage for Postpartum Moms,” Health Affairs Blog, May 6, 2019.

23. New Zealand Ministry of Health, “The First-Week Visit,” last updated June 30, 2015.

24. International Labor Organization, “Maternity Leave and Related Types of Leave,” in Maternity Protection Resource Package: From Aspiration to Reality for All (ILO, 2012).

25. Saraswathi Vedam et al., “Mapping Integration of Midwives Across the United States: Impact on Access, Equity, and Outcomes,” PLoS One 13, no. 2 (Feb. 21, 2018): e0192523.

26. Association of State and Territorial Health Officials, “COVID-19’s Impact on Pregnancy and Childbirth Policies,” ASTHO Experts Blog, Apr. 22, 2020; and Taylor Platt, States Implement Strategies to Safeguard Pregnant Women during the COVID-19 Pandemic (National Academy for State Health Policy, Apr. 20, 2020).

27. ANCM, Ensuring Access, 2014; and Moore et al., Improving Maternal Health Access, 2020.

28. Kirstie Coxon et al., “The Impact of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic on Maternity Care in Europe,” Midwifery 88 (Sept. 2020): 102779; and WHO Europe, “Coronavirus and Pregnancy — Preserving Maternal Health Across the European Region,” WHO, June 30, 2020.

29. Tikkanen et al., International Profiles, 2020.

30. For example, many types of non-ACA-compliant plans, such as short-term plans or association health plans as well as some student health plans, don’t cover maternity benefits. Some young adults staying on a parent’s health plan have not had their maternity care costs covered, because the ACA only mandates maternity care coverage for primary beneficiaries, not for their children. In addition, the ACA’s 10 essential health benefits that insurers must cover, which include maternity care, apply only to individual marketplace insurance plans and small-group plans — but not employers with more than 50 workers.

31. Robin A. Cohen and Michael E. Martinez, Health Insurance Coverage: Early Release of Estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, 2013 (National Center for Health Statistics, June 2014).

32. Health Resources and Services Administration, The Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program: Partnering with Parents to Help Children Succeed (HRSA, Apr. 2020).

33. WHO et al., Postnatal Care, 2015; and “ACOG Committee Opinion No. 736: Optimizing Postpartum Care,” Obstetrics and Gynecology 131, no. 5 (May 2018): e140–e150.

34. Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission (MACPAC), Medicaid’s Role in Financing Maternity Care (MACPAC, Jan. 2020); and Sarah H. Gordon et al., “Effects of Medicaid Expansion on Postpartum Coverage and Outpatient Utilization,” Health Affairs 39, no. 1 (Jan. 2020): 77–84.

35. Emily Eckert, “It’s Past Time to Provide Continuous Medicaid Coverage for One Year Postpartum,” Health Affairs Blog, Feb. 6, 2020; Laurie Zephyrin et al., “Increasing Postpartum Medicaid Coverage Could Reduce Maternal Deaths and Improve Outcomes,” To the Point (blog), Commonwealth Fund, Nov. 21, 2019; Review to Action and MMRIA, Report from Nine Maternal Mortality Review Committees (Review to Action, 2018); and Petersen et al., “Vital Signs,” 2019.

36. OECD Family Database, “Parental Leave Systems,” Aug. 2019.

37. Sarah A. Donovan, Paid Family Leave in the United States, Report R44835 (Congressional Research Service, updated May 29, 2019).

38. Judy Jou et al., “Paid Maternity Leave in the United States: Associations with Maternal and Infant Health,” Maternal and Child Health Journal 22, no. 2 (Feb. 2018): 216–25.

39. Donna L. Hoyert and Arialdi M. Miniño, “Maternal Mortality in the United States: Changes in Coding, Publication, and Data Release,” National Vital Statistics Report 69, no. 2 (Jan. 2020): 1–18.

40. Sandhya Raman, “COVID-19 Amplifies Racial Disparities in Maternal Health,” Roll Call, May 14, 2020; Black Women’s Maternal Health: A Multifaceted Approach to Addressing Persistent and Dire Health Disparities (National Partnership for Women & Families, Apr. 2018); Xenia Shih Bion, Efforts to Reduce Black Maternal Mortality Complicated by COVID-19 (California Health Care Foundation, Apr. 2020); and Yaphet Getachew et al., Beyond the Case Count: The Wide-Ranging Disparities of COVID-19 in the United States (Commonwealth Fund, Sept. 2020).

41. Marian Knight et al. (eds.), on behalf of MBRRACE-UK, Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care: Lessons Learned to Inform Maternity Care from the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity 2015-17 (National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Nov. 2019).

42. Morrissey et al., “International Health Care Systems,” 2015.

Publication Details

Publication Date: November 18, 2020
Contact: Roosa Tikkanen, Senior Research Associate, International Program in Health Policy and Practice Innovations, The Commonwealth Fund
Citation:

Roosa Tikkanen et al., Maternal Mortality and Maternity Care in the United States Compared to 10 Other Developed Countries (Commonwealth Fund, Nov. 2020). https://doi.org/10.26099/411v-9255

Experts

Roosa Tikkanen
Senior Research Associate, International Program in Health Policy and Practice Innovations, The Commonwealth Fund
Munira Z. Gunja
Senior Researcher, Health Care Coverage and Access, The Commonwealth Fund
Molly FitzGerald
Senior Program Associate for Fellowships and Research, International Program in Health Policy and Practice Innovations, The Commonwealth Fund
Laurie Zephyrin, M.D.
Vice President, Delivery System Reform, The Commonwealth Fund