Skip to main content

Advanced Search

Advanced Search

Current Filters

Filter your query

Publication Types

Other

to

Blog

/

U.S. Overdose Deaths Remain Higher Than in Other Countries — Trend-Tracking and Harm-Reduction Policies Could Help

Hands exchange package of syringes

A patient receives syringes from a staffer at Lisbon’s Ares do Pinhal Association for Social Inclusion, which runs a daily methadone program as part of Portugal’s efforts to treat drug addiction. The U.S. can learn from other countries by tracking emerging trends and adopting comprehensive approaches to prevention and treatment that prioritize public health and harm reduction. Photo: Horacio Villalobos/Corbis via Getty Images

A patient receives syringes from a staffer at Lisbon’s Ares do Pinhal Association for Social Inclusion, which runs a daily methadone program as part of Portugal’s efforts to treat drug addiction. The U.S. can learn from other countries by tracking emerging trends and adopting comprehensive approaches to prevention and treatment that prioritize public health and harm reduction. Photo: Horacio Villalobos/Corbis via Getty Images

Authors
  • Evan Gumas
    Evan D. Gumas

    Research Associate, International Health Policy and Practice Innovations, The Commonwealth Fund

Authors
  • Evan Gumas
    Evan D. Gumas

    Research Associate, International Health Policy and Practice Innovations, The Commonwealth Fund

Toplines
  • The United States has the highest rate of overdose deaths in the world, with more than 100,000 Americans dying by overdose in 2023, according to provisional CDC data

  • Compared with other countries, the U.S. approach to reducing overdose deaths is fragmented and inadequate, with policies on interventions such as naloxone and clean syringe services varying widely from state to state

Downloads

Provisional data show that drug overdoses in the United States claimed more than 100,000 lives for a third consecutive year in 2023 — a more than 50 percent jump since 2019. By a substantial margin, the U.S. has the highest rate of overdose deaths in the world, followed by Puerto Rico — a U.S. territory. And while Scotland and Canada, the second- and third-ranked countries, saw decreases from 2021 to 2022, rates in the U.S. have remained high. Our analysis, using the latest mortality data from 2022, compares the U.S. overdose rate — 324 deaths per 1 million people, or almost 108,000 deaths in 2022 — to dozens of countries from across the globe and finds that the U.S. unequivocally has the highest rate of overdose deaths in the world.

The U.S. can learn from other countries by tracking emerging trends and adopting comprehensive approaches to prevention and treatment that prioritize public health and harm reduction.

Gumas_intl_overdose_deaths_Exhibit

Emerging trends. Polysubstance use — that is, exposure to more than one drug, with or without the knowledge of the person using them — and the emergence of new substances pose significant challenges. Recently xylazine, a type of tranquilizer not approved for humans and particularly lethal in combination with fentanyl, has become more prevalent in overdose deaths in every region of the U.S., but largely in southern states. In a study of 20 states and Washington D.C., there was an almost fourfold increase in xylazine being found in deaths involving illegally made fentanyl between 2019 and 2022. Polysubstance use has become the norm in Europe, where heroin has been replaced with combinations of opioids as the primary cause of drug-related deaths.

Counterfeit pills are frequently cited in overdose deaths. Often unknown to the person taking it, these pills may contain more than one substance or drug. The percentage of deaths involving counterfeit pills more than doubled between 2019 and 2021. These trends emphasize the importance of improving drug-screening methods and early-detection systems to detect contaminated drug supplies to alert the population and mitigate overdose risks.

Synthetic opioid deaths are rising around the world, though fentanyl is not the primary driver as in the U.S. Some European countries, particularly in the Baltic region, as well as the U.K. have reported concerning rises in nitazenes (a new synthetic opioid that has not been approved for medical use) in recent years, signaling a worrying shift. In Brazil, nitazenes make up the majority of synthetics detected in the drug supply. Such developments highlight the importance of international cooperation in monitoring drug trends and sharing strategies for early identification of drug-use trends; for example, through the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime’s Early Warning Advisory system.

Treatment, prevention, and care. It is vital that we adopt comprehensive prevention strategies. In the U.S., access to medication-assisted treatment remains severely inadequate; prior research shows that only 11 percent of Americans with opioid use disorder (OUD) received opioid substitution therapy in 2020, compared with 87 percent and 86 percent in France and Norway, respectively. In Scotland, 51 percent of people with OUD received substitution therapy in 2020. The country recently announced an increase in funding to tackle the drug crisis, with funding going toward improving standards for methadone prescribing.

In the U.S., harm-reduction policies and practices are fragmented — meaning they differ state to state — making it challenging to prevent overdose deaths from a national angle. Harm reduction remains a critical means to reducing the number of fatalities due to drug overdose, as well as slowing the transmission of infectious diseases. As of 2023, 109 countries had national harm-reduction policies, but similar policies remain limited in the U.S.

Research has suggested that synthetic opioids require higher doses of naloxone to reverse overdose. Portugal has long had peer distribution of naloxone — meaning people who use drugs can distribute naloxone and other harm-reduction supplies directly to peers. Colombia and other countries have also recently introduced this practice. But in the U.S., there are restrictions on access to naloxone for overdose reversal or for fentanyl test strips for drug checking. Laws vary by state, with some allowing civilians to administer naloxone (once they obtain a prescription from a medical professional) and some only allowing administration by medical personnel. In addition, naloxone is not always free; this may present a barrier for people who need it most. In some states, fentanyl test strips are criminalized under drug paraphernalia laws.

It will be important to monitor the landscape of drug use and focus efforts on providing appropriate and timely care. For example, the U.S. has seen increases in smoking and other noninjection methods implicated in drug-related deaths, making it critical that harm-reduction efforts going forward highlight smoking and other drug-consumption routes, as well as ensuring support for syringe services programs. Syringe services programs are illegal in several states, despite evidence that shows they do not increase illegal drug use or crime, and at the same time, reduce the transmission of disease, improve cessation of drug use, reduce injection as the primary route of drug consumption, improve access to drug treatment services or resources, and lower the likelihood of death from overdose.

Effective health promotion. Across all its approaches and policies, the U.S. must prioritize messaging that does not introduce further harm by stigmatizing drug use and drug users. Despite early evidence showing that deaths may have dropped from 2022 to 2023, it is too early to treat these results as a positive development; we must continue to prioritize reducing the harms associated with drug use. Catering messaging and interventions thoughtfully to account for differences in populations is crucial to ensuring communications and interventions to prevent drug deaths are as effective as possible.

The U.S. should look to the Portuguese model of emphasizing public health and health care — and other lessons from abroad — to reduce the associated harms of drug use and address the crisis happening all over the United States.

Data and Methods

The exhibit (overdose/drug-related mortality) uses data from a wide range of U.S. and international sources. These data sources and metrics can have important and subtle differences, and the findings are not necessarily comparable in all instances.

For example, the definition of drug overdose deaths reported in the United States does not match up directly with the definition of “drug-induced deaths” collected in some European countries and published by the European Union Drugs Agency (EUDA) (formerly the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA)). Or in the case of Canada, only opioid-related mortality statistics are included. Where possible, we have tried to use international metrics that align with the definition of drug overdose deaths in the United States. Overdose mortality rates presented are also unadjusted for population age differences, though using the ages 15–64 population in each country as the denominator results in a nearly identical rank order (see the appendix). Rates for some countries should be interpreted with caution as mortality numbers may be underreported due to incomplete mortality data or lack of appropriate coding. For the purposes of this analysis, these are the most complete cross-national estimates.

The rates presented in this analysis represent the most comparable and available international data for these metrics and provide an important foundation for understanding current international differences. They also represent the need for further international data standardization and collaboration.

In the appendix we have detailed and documented sources and overdose/drug-related mortality definitions for each of the data points used in the exhibit, including potential limitations that should be considered when comparing countries.

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Kate Cloonan, Michelle Putnam, and Hanna Schurman from the Division of Overdose Prevention (DOP) and National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (NCIPC) within the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Munira Gunja and Reggie Williams from the Commonwealth Fund for their review of this analysis. The author would also like to extend special thanks to Deb Lorber, Aishu Balaji, Sam Chase, Paul Frame, and Jen Wilson from the Commonwealth Fund’s communications team for editing and design.

Publication Details

Date

Contact

Evan D. Gumas, Research Associate, International Health Policy and Practice Innovations, The Commonwealth Fund

[email protected]

Citation

Evan D. Gumas, “U.S. Overdose Deaths Remain Higher Than in Other Countries — Trend-Tracking and Harm-Reduction Policies Could Help,” To the Point (blog), Commonwealth Fund, Jan. 9, 2025. https://doi.org/10.26099/ppdk-qy10